news reaction legal analysis State Court

Republicans Hold the Georgia Supreme Court — and That Matters for the Second Amendment

Mark W. Smith Mark W. Smith
14:21
Mark's Hot Take
Two conservative Georgia Supreme Court justices just won reelection in a race most people never even noticed — and that result will shape Second Amendment rights, redistricting battles, and election integrity in Georgia for years to come.
— Mark W. Smith Share on X

May 19, 2026 delivered a major conservative victory — not in Congress, not at the White House, but in a Georgia courthouse election that almost nobody was watching. Two Republican-appointed incumbents on the Supreme Court of Georgia held their seats decisively, keeping the state’s highest court firmly in conservative hands. This is exactly the kind of quiet, structural win that translates directly into real-world protection for your Second Amendment rights, your vote, and the rule of law.

Why State Supreme Courts Are the Real Battleground

I have been hammering this point on this channel for years — state supreme courts matter enormously, and yet most gun owners and conservatives pay them zero attention. We just saw proof of that with the Supreme Court of Virginia, which struck down Governor Abigail Spanberger’s mid-decade congressional redistricting scheme 4–3. That ruling saved Virginia’s 2026 congressional map. When U.S. Supreme Court refused to grant an emergency stay, it was over. Spanberger’s power grab died in state court.

Georgia just gave us the same lesson. The Supreme Court of Georgia now has eight of its nine justices appointed by Republican governors. That is a structural asset for conservatives in everything from election disputes to Second Amendment challenges filed in state court. Letting that majority slip by ignoring a nonpartisan judicial election would have been a catastrophic, unforced error.

What Just Happened in Georgia

Georgia’s Supreme Court elections are technically nonpartisan — candidates don’t appear on the ballot under a party label. But everyone who follows state politics understands where the judicial philosophies fall. On May 19, Justice Charles Bethel and Justice Sarah Hawkins Warren, both appointed by Governor Nathan Deal in 2018, faced well-funded liberal challengers. Former state Senator Jen Jordan challenged Justice Warren. Attorney Miracle Rankin challenged Justice Bethel. Both challengers had the backing of pro-abortion groups and, notably, Barack Obama.

Both lost. Warren won her race decisively, roughly 59–41. Bethel held on in a closer contest. The conservative majority on the Supreme Court of Georgia is intact.

The Stakes: Redistricting, the 2030 Census, and SCOTUS Seats

Here is where my analysis diverges from the typical political commentary you’ll see on cable news. The significance of this result is not just symbolic — it is strategic, and it plays out on at least three separate timelines.

First, redistricting. Georgia will face mid-decade congressional map fights over the next two years, with litigation that will inevitably land at the state supreme court. Having conservative justices on that bench is the difference between fair maps and the kind of manufactured Democratic gerrymandering that Spanberger tried to ram through in Virginia.

Second, the 2030 census. For the first time in memory, there is a real chance that the Census Bureau will count legal residents and citizens rather than padding numbers with illegal aliens who inflate congressional representation for blue states like California, Illinois, and New York. That reapportionment battle will generate enormous litigation touching state courts across the country. Georgia being in conservative hands matters.

Third — and this one goes straight to the Supreme Court of the United States — Donald Trump needs to hold the Senate after November 2026 to confirm any future Supreme Court nominees. A Justice who is soft on the Second Amendment, or hostile to it, can unravel everything Bruen built. That makes the Georgia Senate race this November an enormous deal.

Jon Ossoff Is More Vulnerable Than the Media Admits

My read on Senator Jon Ossoff is that he is the most vulnerable Democratic incumbent on the Senate map this November. Here is why. The only statewide race Ossoff has ever won was on January 5, 2021 — the Georgia runoff — and he ran that race alongside Senator Raphael Warnock, one of the most genuinely popular Democratic politicians in the country. Warnock is a superstar who turns out Democratic base voters at a level very few politicians can match.

Warnock is not on the 2026 ballot.

Ossoff will run a standalone race this November without that coattail lift. Georgia has been drifting back toward its conservative baseline — and the Supreme Court results from May 19 are evidence of that drift. If Republicans and Trump are paying attention, that Senate seat is very much in play. And keeping the Senate is non-negotiable if we want originalist justices confirmed to the Supreme Court.

What All of This Tells Us About Trump’s Actual Popularity

I’ll say one more thing, because I’ve lived this personally. I was on the Donald Trump presidential campaign and transition team in 2015 and 2016, and I heard the same “Trump is unpopular” talking points then that I hear today. The polls were wrong then. They’re wrong now. When virtually every single Trump-endorsed candidate across the country wins on the same night, that is not the track record of an unpopular president. Trust the results, not the narrative.

The Georgia Supreme Court race is another data point in that story — and for Second Amendment advocates, it is one of the most important data points of 2026.


This article is based on analysis by Professor Mark W. Smith, constitutional attorney and Host of the Four Boxes Diner 2nd Amendment channel. Watch the original video here. This does not constitute legal advice.

2A
Soon